<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 550 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95825</link>
    <description>The exemption claim for clearances by a 100% EOU into the domestic tariff area turned on whether the benefit of Notification No. 8/97-C.E. could be denied without considering Board Circular No. 442/8/99-CX. The circular stated that the exemption could extend to units using imported and indigenous raw materials if the jurisdictional authorities were satisfied, on records and verification of the manufacturing process, that the inputs were indigenous. As the lower authorities had not examined the circular, the matter required fresh scrutiny by the original authority, and the exemption question was remitted for de novo consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:40:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 550 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95825</link>
      <description>The exemption claim for clearances by a 100% EOU into the domestic tariff area turned on whether the benefit of Notification No. 8/97-C.E. could be denied without considering Board Circular No. 442/8/99-CX. The circular stated that the exemption could extend to units using imported and indigenous raw materials if the jurisdictional authorities were satisfied, on records and verification of the manufacturing process, that the inputs were indigenous. As the lower authorities had not examined the circular, the matter required fresh scrutiny by the original authority, and the exemption question was remitted for de novo consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>