<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 348 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95815</link>
    <description>The packed commodities regime was treated as applicable once the relevant provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977 had been brought into force by notification, without needing a separate notification for each class of goods. The court further applied a broad construction of &quot;commodity in packaged form&quot; and &quot;pre-packed commodity&quot;, focusing on whether the goods were marketed and sold through packaging as part of the retail sale process. Electronic printers sold through dealers across States were found to fall within that regime, so statutory declarations and related requirements applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 348 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95815</link>
      <description>The packed commodities regime was treated as applicable once the relevant provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977 had been brought into force by notification, without needing a separate notification for each class of goods. The court further applied a broad construction of &quot;commodity in packaged form&quot; and &quot;pre-packed commodity&quot;, focusing on whether the goods were marketed and sold through packaging as part of the retail sale process. Electronic printers sold through dealers across States were found to fall within that regime, so statutory declarations and related requirements applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>