<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 427 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95808</link>
    <description>A policy ban on skimmed milk powder exports remained valid, but where the authorities had reserved case-by-case consideration of existing export commitments, the refusal had to address concluded contracts and placed materials fairly and rationally. The impugned order was found unsustainable because it did not examine the petitioner&#039;s accrued obligations, gave no rational basis for denying limited permission, and failed the standards of non-arbitrariness and legitimate expectation in governmental policy change. The refusal was quashed and the request was directed to be reconsidered afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 427 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95808</link>
      <description>A policy ban on skimmed milk powder exports remained valid, but where the authorities had reserved case-by-case consideration of existing export commitments, the refusal had to address concluded contracts and placed materials fairly and rationally. The impugned order was found unsustainable because it did not examine the petitioner&#039;s accrued obligations, gave no rational basis for denying limited permission, and failed the standards of non-arbitrariness and legitimate expectation in governmental policy change. The refusal was quashed and the request was directed to be reconsidered afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>