<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 442 - CEGAT,  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95788</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellants. It held that the transportation costs incurred by M/s. Hindustan Lever Ltd. were incorrectly added to the assessable value, as the transactions were complete at the factory gate. The Tribunal also ruled that the appellants and M/s. Hindustan Lever Ltd. were not related persons, thus rejecting the demand based on related party status. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants, providing them with relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:23:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 442 - CEGAT,  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95788</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellants. It held that the transportation costs incurred by M/s. Hindustan Lever Ltd. were incorrectly added to the assessable value, as the transactions were complete at the factory gate. The Tribunal also ruled that the appellants and M/s. Hindustan Lever Ltd. were not related persons, thus rejecting the demand based on related party status. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants, providing them with relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>