https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95782 Revocation of a CHA licence was upheld where the agent failed to meet the prescribed cargo-clearance norms under Regulation 12(2) and the related public notice. The governing licensing framework required satisfactory performance against the stipulated quantity or value thresholds, and it did not permit relaxation on compassionate grounds or for medical difficulties. Because the appellant's performance was found unsatisfactory by reference to those norms, the revocation under Rule 21 was treated as justified and the challenge failed. en-us Fri, 08 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:43:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95782 Revocation of a CHA licence was upheld where the agent failed to meet the prescribed cargo-clearance norms under Regulation 12(2) and the related public notice. The governing licensing framework required satisfactory performance against the stipulated quantity or value thresholds, and it did not permit relaxation on compassionate grounds or for medical difficulties. Because the appellant's performance was found unsatisfactory by reference to those norms, the revocation under Rule 21 was treated as justified and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95782