<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 562 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95779</link>
    <description>Natural justice requires reasoned consideration of defence material derived from seized records and a justified approach to cross-examination of relied-upon witnesses. Demands and penalties based substantially on a seized diary and witness statements could not be sustained where the adjudicating authority failed to address the defence chart prepared from that diary, denied cross-examination of a material witness and detecting officers without adequate reasons, and did not explain corroboration of the witness statement. The adjudication was to be set aside for fresh determination after permitting cross-examination and allowing the noticee to present defence material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:38:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 562 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95779</link>
      <description>Natural justice requires reasoned consideration of defence material derived from seized records and a justified approach to cross-examination of relied-upon witnesses. Demands and penalties based substantially on a seized diary and witness statements could not be sustained where the adjudicating authority failed to address the defence chart prepared from that diary, denied cross-examination of a material witness and detecting officers without adequate reasons, and did not explain corroboration of the witness statement. The adjudication was to be set aside for fresh determination after permitting cross-examination and allowing the noticee to present defence material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>