<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 554 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95771</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) and restoring those of the Assistant Commissioner. The decision clarified the correct application of the rate of exchange and duty based on the actual importer at the time of filing the bills of entry, emphasizing compliance with the law over past practices in the Custom House.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:25:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 554 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95771</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) and restoring those of the Assistant Commissioner. The decision clarified the correct application of the rate of exchange and duty based on the actual importer at the time of filing the bills of entry, emphasizing compliance with the law over past practices in the Custom House.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>