<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 484 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assembly of fax machines imported in knocked down condition constitutes manufacturing under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. It determined that the process resulted in a distinct commercial product with a new name, character, and use, aligning with Note 6 to Section XVI. Despite the Appellants&#039; arguments based on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the transformative nature of the assembly process and the emergence of a new product, ultimately rejecting the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:50:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 484 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assembly of fax machines imported in knocked down condition constitutes manufacturing under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. It determined that the process resulted in a distinct commercial product with a new name, character, and use, aligning with Note 6 to Section XVI. Despite the Appellants&#039; arguments based on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the transformative nature of the assembly process and the emergence of a new product, ultimately rejecting the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>