https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95743 Allocation of an appeal to a single Member or a larger Bench is a matter of administrative convenience and does not curtail the inherent jurisdiction of a competent Member to decide the matter. A party that contested the appeal on merits without objecting at the hearing stage could not later treat the order as a nullity for want of jurisdiction. No apparent mistake of fact or law on the face of the order was shown, so the recall application was not maintainable and the impugned order stood. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:22:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95743 Allocation of an appeal to a single Member or a larger Bench is a matter of administrative convenience and does not curtail the inherent jurisdiction of a competent Member to decide the matter. A party that contested the appeal on merits without objecting at the hearing stage could not later treat the order as a nullity for want of jurisdiction. No apparent mistake of fact or law on the face of the order was shown, so the recall application was not maintainable and the impugned order stood. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95743