<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 569 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95717</link>
    <description>Shoe shampoo was classified by reference to its essential function of cleaning shoes and removing dirt, placing it within washing and cleaning preparations under Heading 34.02. The footwear polish entry in Sub-heading 3405.10 did not apply because the word &quot;similar&quot; does not extend to a product that is not comparable to polish or cream in character or use merely because it is used on footwear. It also did not fall under Sub-heading 3405.40, as no material showed it to be a scouring preparation within the meaning of the HSN notes. The presence of a specific cleaning heading excluded recourse to the footwear polish heading.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 569 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95717</link>
      <description>Shoe shampoo was classified by reference to its essential function of cleaning shoes and removing dirt, placing it within washing and cleaning preparations under Heading 34.02. The footwear polish entry in Sub-heading 3405.10 did not apply because the word &quot;similar&quot; does not extend to a product that is not comparable to polish or cream in character or use merely because it is used on footwear. It also did not fall under Sub-heading 3405.40, as no material showed it to be a scouring preparation within the meaning of the HSN notes. The presence of a specific cleaning heading excluded recourse to the footwear polish heading.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>