<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 558 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95706</link>
    <description>Wiring harness classification under the Central Excise Tariff was determined by applying an earlier Tribunal ruling that treated such goods as falling under Heading 8544.00. The claim for classification under Heading 8708.00 was rejected because the binding prior view governed the dispute. The operative effect is that wiring harness is classifiable under Heading 8544.00 rather than Heading 8708.00.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:49:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 558 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95706</link>
      <description>Wiring harness classification under the Central Excise Tariff was determined by applying an earlier Tribunal ruling that treated such goods as falling under Heading 8544.00. The claim for classification under Heading 8708.00 was rejected because the binding prior view governed the dispute. The operative effect is that wiring harness is classifiable under Heading 8544.00 rather than Heading 8708.00.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>