<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 552 - CEGAT, MUMBAI I</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95700</link>
    <description>Dry battery cells supplied with television remote controls were treated as inputs under Rule 57A because an earlier Tribunal decision had already classified them that way, and no reason was found to depart from that view. The commentary applies the principle that a prior binding or persuasive Tribunal ruling on input classification will ordinarily be followed unless there is a clear basis to differ. On that approach, the respondent&#039;s entitlement on the input issue was upheld and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:34:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 552 - CEGAT, MUMBAI I</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95700</link>
      <description>Dry battery cells supplied with television remote controls were treated as inputs under Rule 57A because an earlier Tribunal decision had already classified them that way, and no reason was found to depart from that view. The commentary applies the principle that a prior binding or persuasive Tribunal ruling on input classification will ordinarily be followed unless there is a clear basis to differ. On that approach, the respondent&#039;s entitlement on the input issue was upheld and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>