<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 540 - CEGAT, iKOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95689</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the classification of &quot;Jute Webbings&quot; under sub-heading 5806.90 as narrow woven fabrics, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal considered the width, selvedges, and end use of the goods, aligning with the criteria for &quot;narrow woven fabrics&quot; under the Harmonized System Nomenclature (HSN) notes. The decision was based on the nature of the goods as straps rather than jute fabric, in accordance with the HSN guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:42:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 540 - CEGAT, iKOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95689</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the classification of &quot;Jute Webbings&quot; under sub-heading 5806.90 as narrow woven fabrics, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal considered the width, selvedges, and end use of the goods, aligning with the criteria for &quot;narrow woven fabrics&quot; under the Harmonized System Nomenclature (HSN) notes. The decision was based on the nature of the goods as straps rather than jute fabric, in accordance with the HSN guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>