https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95686 The judgment set aside the orders confirming duty demands on glass fibre/wool waste, emphasizing the need for re-examination based on legal precedents. The Commissioner's decision was criticized for not proving marketability or providing substantial evidence for classification. The court highlighted the importance of considering precedents like Moti Laminates and Union of India v. Indian Aluminium Company P. Ltd. in determining excisability. The case was remanded for further adjudication in line with established legal principles. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:35:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95686 The judgment set aside the orders confirming duty demands on glass fibre/wool waste, emphasizing the need for re-examination based on legal precedents. The Commissioner's decision was criticized for not proving marketability or providing substantial evidence for classification. The court highlighted the importance of considering precedents like Moti Laminates and Union of India v. Indian Aluminium Company P. Ltd. in determining excisability. The case was remanded for further adjudication in line with established legal principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95686