https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95667 Wiring harness was treated as classifiable under Central Excise Tariff sub-heading 8544.00, because earlier Tribunal authority had already settled that classification, and the competing claim under sub-heading 8708 was rejected. In the post-1995 declaration regime, duty could also be raised for the period before the show cause notice, since classification-list approval had been dispensed with and the earlier approval-based precedent was inapplicable. The assessee's challenge failed on both issues, and the demand was upheld. en-us Thu, 06 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:37:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95667 Wiring harness was treated as classifiable under Central Excise Tariff sub-heading 8544.00, because earlier Tribunal authority had already settled that classification, and the competing claim under sub-heading 8708 was rejected. In the post-1995 declaration regime, duty could also be raised for the period before the show cause notice, since classification-list approval had been dispensed with and the earlier approval-based precedent was inapplicable. The assessee's challenge failed on both issues, and the demand was upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95667