<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 419 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95652</link>
    <description>Conflicting Tribunal decisions on the admissibility of deemed Modvat credit after crossing the prescribed clearance limit showed that the issue was not settled and a referable question of law arose. The Tribunal noted that its earlier view in the matter differed from the later view of a Larger Bench on the same legal question. Because of this divergence, the reference application was held maintainable and was allowed, and the matter was directed to be referred to the High Court for opinion on the admissibility issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 419 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95652</link>
      <description>Conflicting Tribunal decisions on the admissibility of deemed Modvat credit after crossing the prescribed clearance limit showed that the issue was not settled and a referable question of law arose. The Tribunal noted that its earlier view in the matter differed from the later view of a Larger Bench on the same legal question. Because of this divergence, the reference application was held maintainable and was allowed, and the matter was directed to be referred to the High Court for opinion on the admissibility issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>