<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 500 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95632</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order due to procedural irregularities and lack of factual findings. The decision emphasized the necessity of issuing show-cause notices and establishing factual bases for penalties under the Customs Act. The ruling clarified that the order did not bar customs authorities from initiating proceedings against the appellants with proper notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:26:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 500 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95632</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order due to procedural irregularities and lack of factual findings. The decision emphasized the necessity of issuing show-cause notices and establishing factual bases for penalties under the Customs Act. The ruling clarified that the order did not bar customs authorities from initiating proceedings against the appellants with proper notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>