<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 444 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95630</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that vertical blinds constituted manufactured goods subject to central excise duty. The tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments on exemption notification and classification but agreed on the correct computation of duty amount, remanding for a fresh calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:14:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 444 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95630</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that vertical blinds constituted manufactured goods subject to central excise duty. The tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments on exemption notification and classification but agreed on the correct computation of duty amount, remanding for a fresh calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>