<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 435 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95621</link>
    <description>Notification No. 60/88 exempted only authorised quantities of newsprint and required production of the relevant entitlement certificate within the prescribed period or a validly extended period. Failure to produce certificates in time, rejection of condonation, and reliance on certificates not issued to or covering the claimant precluded the exemption, reflecting strict compliance with fiscal exemption conditions. Clearances at a nil rate under the claimed exemption also required reversal of input credit. Monetary adjustment against modvat credit after a show cause notice, or refund-based relief without following the statutory refund procedure, was unavailable. The duty demand and penalty were upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:50:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 435 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95621</link>
      <description>Notification No. 60/88 exempted only authorised quantities of newsprint and required production of the relevant entitlement certificate within the prescribed period or a validly extended period. Failure to produce certificates in time, rejection of condonation, and reliance on certificates not issued to or covering the claimant precluded the exemption, reflecting strict compliance with fiscal exemption conditions. Clearances at a nil rate under the claimed exemption also required reversal of input credit. Monetary adjustment against modvat credit after a show cause notice, or refund-based relief without following the statutory refund procedure, was unavailable. The duty demand and penalty were upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>