<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 561 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95615</link>
    <description>Where the invoice price is accepted as the actual sale price and no evidence shows any additional consideration flowing back from buyers, that price constitutes the sole consideration for valuation under central excise principles. On that basis, differential excise duty cannot be demanded merely because a higher declared value is suggested. Once the duty demand fails, any penalty and interest based on that demand also cannot survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:31:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 561 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95615</link>
      <description>Where the invoice price is accepted as the actual sale price and no evidence shows any additional consideration flowing back from buyers, that price constitutes the sole consideration for valuation under central excise principles. On that basis, differential excise duty cannot be demanded merely because a higher declared value is suggested. Once the duty demand fails, any penalty and interest based on that demand also cannot survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>