<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 558 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95612</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was admissible on electrical parts used through control panels for power transmission to manufacturing machines, on weighing machines and their parts, and on material handling equipment used within the factory under Rule 57Q. The items were treated as durable components forming part of &quot;plant&quot; and therefore qualifying as capital goods, rather than consumables. The date of 16-3-1995 under Notification No. 11/95-NT was held irrelevant in light of the Larger Bench ruling in Jawahar Mills, while the weighing machine claim was supported by the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision in Modi Xerox Ltd. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:28:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 558 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95612</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was admissible on electrical parts used through control panels for power transmission to manufacturing machines, on weighing machines and their parts, and on material handling equipment used within the factory under Rule 57Q. The items were treated as durable components forming part of &quot;plant&quot; and therefore qualifying as capital goods, rather than consumables. The date of 16-3-1995 under Notification No. 11/95-NT was held irrelevant in light of the Larger Bench ruling in Jawahar Mills, while the weighing machine claim was supported by the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision in Modi Xerox Ltd. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>