<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 542 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95596</link>
    <description>Cassette housings for audio/video cassettes were clarified to fall under Heading 39.26 of the Central Excise Tariff, not Heading 85.23. A circular issued under Section 37B of the Central Excises Act is binding on departmental authorities, so the classification adopted in the impugned order could not prevail against that clarification. The correct classification was therefore under Heading 39.26 in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 542 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95596</link>
      <description>Cassette housings for audio/video cassettes were clarified to fall under Heading 39.26 of the Central Excise Tariff, not Heading 85.23. A circular issued under Section 37B of the Central Excises Act is binding on departmental authorities, so the classification adopted in the impugned order could not prevail against that clarification. The correct classification was therefore under Heading 39.26 in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>