<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 541 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95595</link>
    <description>An ethylene oxide road tanker built for mounting and fixing on a chassis was classifiable as a body for motor vehicles under Heading 8707, not as a container under Heading 8609.00. The decisive factor was that the tanker was designed to be bolted onto a vehicle chassis and was not independently equipped as a transport container for carriage of fluids in the manner contemplated by Heading 8609.00. Because the goods answered the description of a motor vehicle body rather than a specialised transport container, the excise classification under Heading 8707 was upheld and the challenge to the contrary classification failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:28:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 541 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95595</link>
      <description>An ethylene oxide road tanker built for mounting and fixing on a chassis was classifiable as a body for motor vehicles under Heading 8707, not as a container under Heading 8609.00. The decisive factor was that the tanker was designed to be bolted onto a vehicle chassis and was not independently equipped as a transport container for carriage of fluids in the manner contemplated by Heading 8609.00. Because the goods answered the description of a motor vehicle body rather than a specialised transport container, the excise classification under Heading 8707 was upheld and the challenge to the contrary classification failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>