<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 508 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95568</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi upheld the imposition of a penalty on the appellant under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, based on the recovery of smuggled goods and related evidence. Despite the appellant&#039;s challenges to the evidence presented, the Tribunal reduced the penalty amount from Rs. one lakh to Rs. 10,000, considering the circumstances and the appellant&#039;s role in the offense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:52:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 508 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95568</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi upheld the imposition of a penalty on the appellant under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, based on the recovery of smuggled goods and related evidence. Despite the appellant&#039;s challenges to the evidence presented, the Tribunal reduced the penalty amount from Rs. one lakh to Rs. 10,000, considering the circumstances and the appellant&#039;s role in the offense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>