<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 515 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95562</link>
    <description>Rule 173L refund turns on whether the returned goods and the reprocessed goods are of the same class, not merely on the tariff headings under which they were cleared. Where both goods remain within the same broad category and retain the same essential character, the statutory condition is satisfied. On that basis, non-textured synthetic filament yarn returned and textured yarn later cleared were treated as the same class of goods, and the refund claim was allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:32:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 515 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95562</link>
      <description>Rule 173L refund turns on whether the returned goods and the reprocessed goods are of the same class, not merely on the tariff headings under which they were cleared. Where both goods remain within the same broad category and retain the same essential character, the statutory condition is satisfied. On that basis, non-textured synthetic filament yarn returned and textured yarn later cleared were treated as the same class of goods, and the refund claim was allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>