<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 514 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95561</link>
    <description>Interest under Section 61(2) of the Customs Act was treated as inapplicable where warehoused goods were cleared within the permitted period under judicial protection and duty was paid later after the dispute ended. The Tribunal reasoned that the provision operated only when goods were removed beyond the warehousing period, and in the absence of an express statutory basis or any court direction to pay interest, the demand could not be sustained. On that footing, the request for reference was declined and the application failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:31:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 514 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95561</link>
      <description>Interest under Section 61(2) of the Customs Act was treated as inapplicable where warehoused goods were cleared within the permitted period under judicial protection and duty was paid later after the dispute ended. The Tribunal reasoned that the provision operated only when goods were removed beyond the warehousing period, and in the absence of an express statutory basis or any court direction to pay interest, the demand could not be sustained. On that footing, the request for reference was declined and the application failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>