<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 437 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95543</link>
    <description>Release paper used in the manufacture of PVC coated fabrics and vinyl floor coverings was treated as an input used in or in relation to manufacture, not as an apparatus or instrument. Following earlier Tribunal decisions on transfer of plastisol and lamination processes, the material was regarded as necessary for obtaining the finished product. Modvat credit under Rule 57A was therefore admissible, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:15:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 437 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95543</link>
      <description>Release paper used in the manufacture of PVC coated fabrics and vinyl floor coverings was treated as an input used in or in relation to manufacture, not as an apparatus or instrument. Following earlier Tribunal decisions on transfer of plastisol and lamination processes, the material was regarded as necessary for obtaining the finished product. Modvat credit under Rule 57A was therefore admissible, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>