https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95511 Revocation of a CHA licence was treated as premature where the alleged licensing violation arose from the same transaction as pending seizure proceedings. The propriety of enforcing the revocation depended on the final outcome of the seizure matter, so immediate implementation was not considered appropriate. The revocation order was therefore stayed pending disposal of the appeal, preserving the appellant's position until the related proceedings were concluded. en-us Tue, 15 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:47:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95511 Revocation of a CHA licence was treated as premature where the alleged licensing violation arose from the same transaction as pending seizure proceedings. The propriety of enforcing the revocation depended on the final outcome of the seizure matter, so immediate implementation was not considered appropriate. The revocation order was therefore stayed pending disposal of the appeal, preserving the appellant's position until the related proceedings were concluded. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 15 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95511