<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 379 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95497</link>
    <description>A manager in overall charge of a factory was held liable to penalty under Rule 209A where the evidence showed his active knowledge and consent to clandestine receipt, production and removal of excisable goods. The manufacturer&#039;s findings of non-accountal of raw material, unrecorded production and clandestine clearance had already attained finality, and the appellant&#039;s statement and corroborative records linked him to clearance without documents against cash payment. While penal liability was sustained, the Tribunal found the penalty excessive on the facts and reduced it in light of his role and surrounding circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:30:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 379 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95497</link>
      <description>A manager in overall charge of a factory was held liable to penalty under Rule 209A where the evidence showed his active knowledge and consent to clandestine receipt, production and removal of excisable goods. The manufacturer&#039;s findings of non-accountal of raw material, unrecorded production and clandestine clearance had already attained finality, and the appellant&#039;s statement and corroborative records linked him to clearance without documents against cash payment. While penal liability was sustained, the Tribunal found the penalty excessive on the facts and reduced it in light of his role and surrounding circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>