<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 351 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95472</link>
    <description>Classification of imported component parts for use in a reach stacker could not be sustained where the proposed basis of classifying the reach stacker under Heading 84.27 had not been properly put to notice. The record also showed that the cited High Court decision relied upon by the importer had not been duly considered. As the existing classification was therefore unsupported by proper notice and adequate consideration of the record, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after giving proper opportunity of hearing and determining the correct classification of the components.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 351 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95472</link>
      <description>Classification of imported component parts for use in a reach stacker could not be sustained where the proposed basis of classifying the reach stacker under Heading 84.27 had not been properly put to notice. The record also showed that the cited High Court decision relied upon by the importer had not been duly considered. As the existing classification was therefore unsupported by proper notice and adequate consideration of the record, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after giving proper opportunity of hearing and determining the correct classification of the components.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>