<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 348 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95470</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled that the conveyor system assembled by the appellant did not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Act and was not subject to duty. The Tribunal found that the system became immovable property once assembled and that the process of dismantling it did not constitute manufacturing. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturned the duty demand, and provided for any necessary relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:36:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 348 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95470</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled that the conveyor system assembled by the appellant did not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Act and was not subject to duty. The Tribunal found that the system became immovable property once assembled and that the process of dismantling it did not constitute manufacturing. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturned the duty demand, and provided for any necessary relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>