https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95438 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding duty demands on silver chloride produced as a bye product during zinc manufacturing. It rejected the claim for benefit under Notification No. 217/86-C.E., stating that the exemption did not apply to silver chloride. The Tribunal clarified the competence of Assistant Collectors in issuing show cause notices and interpreted terms in the notices accurately. The duty demand of Rs. 1,62,56,434 was upheld, emphasizing the assessability of silver chloride and the applicability of duty. en-us Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:29:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95438 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding duty demands on silver chloride produced as a bye product during zinc manufacturing. It rejected the claim for benefit under Notification No. 217/86-C.E., stating that the exemption did not apply to silver chloride. The Tribunal clarified the competence of Assistant Collectors in issuing show cause notices and interpreted terms in the notices accurately. The duty demand of Rs. 1,62,56,434 was upheld, emphasizing the assessability of silver chloride and the applicability of duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95438