<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 396 - CEGAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95435</link>
    <description>Export confiscation under Section 113 of the Customs Act is sustainable only when the statutory conditions are met; a mere mismatch in declared composition does not, by itself, attract confiscation where the goods are neither prohibited nor exported under a claim for drawback. On that reasoning, the proposed confiscation could not be maintained and the penalty also failed. The document states that the appeal succeeded and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 396 - CEGAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95435</link>
      <description>Export confiscation under Section 113 of the Customs Act is sustainable only when the statutory conditions are met; a mere mismatch in declared composition does not, by itself, attract confiscation where the goods are neither prohibited nor exported under a claim for drawback. On that reasoning, the proposed confiscation could not be maintained and the penalty also failed. The document states that the appeal succeeded and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>