<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 389 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95428</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, partially allowing the appeal by setting aside the penalty and reducing the redemption fine. The decision was based on the lack of conclusive evidence implicating the appellant in the smuggling activity, extending the benefit of doubt due to discrepancies in the driver&#039;s statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:06:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 389 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95428</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, partially allowing the appeal by setting aside the penalty and reducing the redemption fine. The decision was based on the lack of conclusive evidence implicating the appellant in the smuggling activity, extending the benefit of doubt due to discrepancies in the driver&#039;s statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>