<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 374 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95414</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was admissible on the original invoice where the duplicate copy had been lost in transit, provided the Assistant Commissioner was satisfied about the claim under Rule 57G(2)(a) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The rule did not require prior permission before the credit was taken. Because the inputs were duty-paid, received in the factory, and used in manufacture, and the assessee had sought regularisation after stating that the duplicate invoices were lost in transit, credit could not be denied solely on that procedural ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:33:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 374 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95414</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was admissible on the original invoice where the duplicate copy had been lost in transit, provided the Assistant Commissioner was satisfied about the claim under Rule 57G(2)(a) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The rule did not require prior permission before the credit was taken. Because the inputs were duty-paid, received in the factory, and used in manufacture, and the assessee had sought regularisation after stating that the duplicate invoices were lost in transit, credit could not be denied solely on that procedural ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>