https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95400 In a Modvat credit dispute, the Tribunal noted that after the Supreme Court ruling on recovery of Modvat credit, recovery under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was not available and, prima facie, pre-deposit under Section 35F could not be insisted upon in such matters. On the extraordinary facts recorded, the Tribunal exercised inherent powers to protect the appellant during the appeal. Stay of collection of the disputed amount was granted pending disposal of the appeal, and the appeal was admitted. en-us Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:48:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95400 In a Modvat credit dispute, the Tribunal noted that after the Supreme Court ruling on recovery of Modvat credit, recovery under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was not available and, prima facie, pre-deposit under Section 35F could not be insisted upon in such matters. On the extraordinary facts recorded, the Tribunal exercised inherent powers to protect the appellant during the appeal. Stay of collection of the disputed amount was granted pending disposal of the appeal, and the appeal was admitted. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95400