<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 355 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a complete waiver of pre-deposit of penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs on M/s. Pretty Women under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The judge found insufficient evidence linking the seized jewellery to the appellants and concluded that the prerequisites for penalty under Section 112 were not met. This decision was based on a strong prima facie case presented by the appellants, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit amounts and scheduling of appeals for regular hearing on a later date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 355 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a complete waiver of pre-deposit of penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs on M/s. Pretty Women under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The judge found insufficient evidence linking the seized jewellery to the appellants and concluded that the prerequisites for penalty under Section 112 were not met. This decision was based on a strong prima facie case presented by the appellants, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit amounts and scheduling of appeals for regular hearing on a later date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>