https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95384 A writ petition challenging a drawback rejection was maintainable despite an alternative statutory remedy because writ jurisdiction may be exercised for jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, and where the impugned order was passed pursuant to earlier court directions. On drawback under the customs law, once goods were entered for export and cleared for exportation, the authority had to confine itself to the statutory conditions and could not reject the claim by enquiring whether the consignee received the goods or by treating the export as fraudulent on matters beyond the statute. The rejection was therefore unsustainable, and the drawback claim had to be reconsidered afresh within the statutory parameters. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95384 A writ petition challenging a drawback rejection was maintainable despite an alternative statutory remedy because writ jurisdiction may be exercised for jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, and where the impugned order was passed pursuant to earlier court directions. On drawback under the customs law, once goods were entered for export and cleared for exportation, the authority had to confine itself to the statutory conditions and could not reject the claim by enquiring whether the consignee received the goods or by treating the export as fraudulent on matters beyond the statute. The rejection was therefore unsustainable, and the drawback claim had to be reconsidered afresh within the statutory parameters. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95384