<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 410 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95349</link>
    <description>Further pre-deposit of disputed duty and penalty was waived pending appeal because the appellant had already paid more than half of the differential duty and showed financial difficulty through income tax returns. On that basis, the stay application was allowed and protection was granted against coercive recovery during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:41:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 410 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95349</link>
      <description>Further pre-deposit of disputed duty and penalty was waived pending appeal because the appellant had already paid more than half of the differential duty and showed financial difficulty through income tax returns. On that basis, the stay application was allowed and protection was granted against coercive recovery during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>