https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95328 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the classification of the Flasher Unit under sub-heading 8531.00 and the Thermocouple under sub-heading 9025.00. The Single Phasing Preventer was classified under sub-heading 85.36, rejecting the appellants' claim for classification under sub-heading 9032.80. The classification of A.C./D.C. Drive was remanded to the Original Authority for reevaluation, with directions to consider sub-heading 8504.00. The Tribunal rejected the appeals for reclassification under different sub-headings, emphasizing the importance of correct classification supported by legal precedents. en-us Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Dec 2011 12:36:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95328 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the classification of the Flasher Unit under sub-heading 8531.00 and the Thermocouple under sub-heading 9025.00. The Single Phasing Preventer was classified under sub-heading 85.36, rejecting the appellants' claim for classification under sub-heading 9032.80. The classification of A.C./D.C. Drive was remanded to the Original Authority for reevaluation, with directions to consider sub-heading 8504.00. The Tribunal rejected the appeals for reclassification under different sub-headings, emphasizing the importance of correct classification supported by legal precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95328