<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 381 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95321</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the assessee relied on an endorsed invoice where the wholesale dealer&#039;s invoice also carried the manufacturer&#039;s invoice serial number and date required by the applicable notification. The governing requirement was that the dealer&#039;s invoice contain the specified particulars of the manufacturer&#039;s invoice, and that condition was satisfied on the facts. Once the actual document was examined against the notification, the alleged defect in the duty-paying document did not survive. The denial of Modvat credit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 12:06:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 381 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95321</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the assessee relied on an endorsed invoice where the wholesale dealer&#039;s invoice also carried the manufacturer&#039;s invoice serial number and date required by the applicable notification. The governing requirement was that the dealer&#039;s invoice contain the specified particulars of the manufacturer&#039;s invoice, and that condition was satisfied on the facts. Once the actual document was examined against the notification, the alleged defect in the duty-paying document did not survive. The denial of Modvat credit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>