https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95309 An appeal dismissed for non-compliance in not filing the order-in-original was restored after the appellant Commissioner filed the required papers and apologised. The Tribunal stated that the applicant must supply documents to the Registry and that sending copies to the departmental representative does not discharge that obligation. It further held that the Commissioner cannot shift responsibility for curing documentary defects in the appeal memorandum onto the departmental representative. The appeal was restored to its original number, and the observations were directed to be sent to the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai. en-us Wed, 06 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:27:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95309 An appeal dismissed for non-compliance in not filing the order-in-original was restored after the appellant Commissioner filed the required papers and apologised. The Tribunal stated that the applicant must supply documents to the Registry and that sending copies to the departmental representative does not discharge that obligation. It further held that the Commissioner cannot shift responsibility for curing documentary defects in the appeal memorandum onto the departmental representative. The appeal was restored to its original number, and the observations were directed to be sent to the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95309