<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 360 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95304</link>
    <description>Marginal delay in filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was held capable of condonation where the assessee showed timely despatch, postal holidays and courier delay as the cause. Because the appeal had been dismissed only on limitation and no decision on merits had been taken, the dismissal was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration. The text stresses that a short, explained delay should not defeat substantive adjudication, and that reconsideration must follow observance of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 360 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95304</link>
      <description>Marginal delay in filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was held capable of condonation where the assessee showed timely despatch, postal holidays and courier delay as the cause. Because the appeal had been dismissed only on limitation and no decision on merits had been taken, the dismissal was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration. The text stresses that a short, explained delay should not defeat substantive adjudication, and that reconsideration must follow observance of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>