https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95295 A typographical error in the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order, consisting only of citation of the wrong statutory provision, was held insufficient to justify restoration of the appeals. The Tribunal found no substantive legal basis to treat the mistaken citation as a curable defect or as a ground for reopening the matter. As the application relied solely on that error and disclosed no further cause for restoration, the request was rejected and the appeals were not restored. en-us Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:36:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95295 A typographical error in the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order, consisting only of citation of the wrong statutory provision, was held insufficient to justify restoration of the appeals. The Tribunal found no substantive legal basis to treat the mistaken citation as a curable defect or as a ground for reopening the matter. As the application relied solely on that error and disclosed no further cause for restoration, the request was rejected and the appeals were not restored. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95295