<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 517 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95292</link>
    <description>Imported truck components remained unutilised in the manufacture of export goods, so duty under Notification No. 77/80 was held payable because mere closure of the factory did not bring the case within the notification&#039;s waiver condition. The duty demand was therefore sustained. Penalty, however, was not maintainable because the record did not show any wilful attempt to evade duty or deliberate default by the importer, and the punitive component was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:26:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 517 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95292</link>
      <description>Imported truck components remained unutilised in the manufacture of export goods, so duty under Notification No. 77/80 was held payable because mere closure of the factory did not bring the case within the notification&#039;s waiver condition. The duty demand was therefore sustained. Penalty, however, was not maintainable because the record did not show any wilful attempt to evade duty or deliberate default by the importer, and the punitive component was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>