<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 280 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95282</link>
    <description>Notification No. 213/86-C.E. was treated as retrospective from 1-3-1986 under the Central Duties of Excise (Retrospective Exemption) Act, 1986 because it was pari materia with Notification No. 212/86-C.E., which had already been held to operate retrospectively to preserve the pre-1-3-1986 duty level. On that basis, duty paid during 13-3-1986 to 18-3-1986 in excess of the applicable reduced rate was considered refundable, and the refund claim was legally sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 280 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95282</link>
      <description>Notification No. 213/86-C.E. was treated as retrospective from 1-3-1986 under the Central Duties of Excise (Retrospective Exemption) Act, 1986 because it was pari materia with Notification No. 212/86-C.E., which had already been held to operate retrospectively to preserve the pre-1-3-1986 duty level. On that basis, duty paid during 13-3-1986 to 18-3-1986 in excess of the applicable reduced rate was considered refundable, and the refund claim was legally sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>