https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95276 Allegations of fraudulent impersonation were raised in pending appeals, with a request to drop the proceedings under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules. No final finding was made on the alleged impersonation or on dropping the appeals; instead, the matters were directed to be consolidated before the same Bench because they arose from a common, voluminous Commissioner's order. The Registry was directed to trace all connected appeals, place them before the same Bench, and notify any appeals already disposed of. The applicants were permitted to be heard on the next date subject to deposit of 50% of the respective penalty amounts and production of proof of deposit. en-us Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:13:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95276 Allegations of fraudulent impersonation were raised in pending appeals, with a request to drop the proceedings under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules. No final finding was made on the alleged impersonation or on dropping the appeals; instead, the matters were directed to be consolidated before the same Bench because they arose from a common, voluminous Commissioner's order. The Registry was directed to trace all connected appeals, place them before the same Bench, and notify any appeals already disposed of. The applicants were permitted to be heard on the next date subject to deposit of 50% of the respective penalty amounts and production of proof of deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95276