<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 338 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95266</link>
    <description>Desoldering pumps were held to be classifiable under Heading 8468 of the Central Excise Tariff rather than Heading 8467. The classification dispute was resolved by following the assessee&#039;s earlier case, where the same goods had already been placed under Heading 8468. On that basis, the contrary classification under Heading 8467 could not be sustained, and the assessee succeeded on tariff classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 338 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95266</link>
      <description>Desoldering pumps were held to be classifiable under Heading 8468 of the Central Excise Tariff rather than Heading 8467. The classification dispute was resolved by following the assessee&#039;s earlier case, where the same goods had already been placed under Heading 8468. On that basis, the contrary classification under Heading 8467 could not be sustained, and the assessee succeeded on tariff classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>