<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 334 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95262</link>
    <description>Slitting and shearing of flat rolled sheets amounts to manufacture only when the process brings into existence a new and distinct marketable product with a different identity, character or use. Where the input and resultant goods remain within the same tariff sub-heading, the activity does not constitute manufacture because no distinct commodity emerges. If the process alters the coils so that the resultant goods fall under a different tariff sub-heading, the issue depends on whether the operation has produced a distinct marketable product; that aspect was left for fresh decision on remand, including consideration of any permissible Modvat credit claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 334 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95262</link>
      <description>Slitting and shearing of flat rolled sheets amounts to manufacture only when the process brings into existence a new and distinct marketable product with a different identity, character or use. Where the input and resultant goods remain within the same tariff sub-heading, the activity does not constitute manufacture because no distinct commodity emerges. If the process alters the coils so that the resultant goods fall under a different tariff sub-heading, the issue depends on whether the operation has produced a distinct marketable product; that aspect was left for fresh decision on remand, including consideration of any permissible Modvat credit claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>