<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 331 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95259</link>
    <description>The application was limited to securing compliance with an earlier Tribunal direction on a refund claim. The explanation for not passing the final order was not accepted, and no sufficient reason was shown for the continued inaction. Immediate compliance was therefore required, and the Assistant Commissioner was directed to pass the final order in terms of the earlier direction within one month and to explain by affidavit if further action was not taken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 331 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95259</link>
      <description>The application was limited to securing compliance with an earlier Tribunal direction on a refund claim. The explanation for not passing the final order was not accepted, and no sufficient reason was shown for the continued inaction. Immediate compliance was therefore required, and the Assistant Commissioner was directed to pass the final order in terms of the earlier direction within one month and to explain by affidavit if further action was not taken.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>